Click here and press the right key for the next slide (or swipe left)
also ...
Press the left key to go backwards (or swipe right)
Press n to toggle whether notes are shown (or add '?notes' to the url before the #)
Press m or double tap to slide thumbnails (menu)
Press ? at any time to show the keyboard shortcuts
Previously (lecture 03)
Russell’s idea:
Reference requires acquaintance.
Q: Does reference require
acquaintance with the referent?
Now (a moment ago)
Reference requires knowledge of reference.
When the utterance of a word refers to a thing,
must the utterer have knowledge of reference?
What is knowledge of reference?
First idea: Knowledge of reference is acquaintance.
I.e. you have knowledge of reference concerning the utterance of a word when you are acquainted with its referent.
Objection: you might be acquainted with the referent while unaware of any connection between it and the utterance.
Second idea: Knowledge of reference is causation by acquaintance.
I.e. you have knowledge of reference concerning the utterance of a word when your use of that word on this occasion is appropriately caused by your acquaintance with an object.
Twist: The utterance refers to the object in virtue of it being your acquiantance with this object appropriately causing your use of it.
Previously (lecture 03)
Russell’s idea:
Reference requires acquaintance.
Q: Does reference require
acquaintance with the referent?
Now (a moment ago)
Reference requires knowledge of reference.
When the utterance of a word refers to a thing,
must the utterer have knowledge of reference?